{"id":23714,"date":"2026-07-07T00:00:11","date_gmt":"2026-07-06T22:00:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\/"},"modified":"2026-07-07T00:06:19","modified_gmt":"2026-07-06T22:06:19","slug":"rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\/","title":{"rendered":"How to search for a buried body?"},"content":{"rendered":"

On 6 July 2026, five years after his wife disappeared, C\u00e9dric Jubillar confessed in a letter to one of his lawyers, admitting that he had killed Delphine and saying he was willing to indicate where he had concealed the body [1]. Convicted at first instance and sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment, with his appeal still pending, he had until then never disclosed the location of the remains, which are still missing today [1]. The case highlights a reality that crime fiction usually glosses over. Locating a buried body, even when a suspect roughly points to the spot, remains one of the most demanding tasks in a criminal investigation. Elapsed time, soil type, grave depth and weather all erase or blur the evidence, so that no single instrument is ever enough. To return a decedent to their family and let the courts rule, police and forensic scientists draw on a range of means spanning ground intelligence, geophysics, botany, mycology, soil chemistry and the noses of trained dogs. This article reviews these methods, how they work, and their real strengths and limitations.<\/h3>

I. Before the technology, ground intelligence and search strategy<\/strong><\/h2>

No camera or radar can replace the preparatory work that narrows down the area to be searched. A single grave rarely exceeds two square metres, and searching blindly across hectares of woodland or field makes no sense. Investigators therefore begin with a desk-based study cross-referencing the suspect’s movements, telephone data, witness accounts and aerial imagery, sometimes historical, that may reveal disturbed ground or a vehicle access point [2]. To this is added an assessment of what geologists call diggability, that is, how easily a person could actually open and backfill a grave given soil depth, the local geology, the water table, obstructions or roots, and the tools available [2]. A Red-Amber-Green prioritisation system then ranks sectors by likelihood, so that resources are focused where they are most useful [2].<\/p>

\"\"<\/figure>

Syst\u00e8me de priorisation par couleurs, rouge, orange et vert, permettant de hi\u00e9rarchiser les secteurs de recherche selon leur probabilit\u00e9, afin de concentrer les moyens l\u00e0 o\u00f9 ils sont le plus utiles. Cr\u00e9dit : ForenSeek<\/em><\/p>

This approach was formalised in 2021 as the geoforensic search strategy, which works from the broadest scale down to the smallest area and from non-intrusive to intrusive methods [3]. In practice it behaves like a funnel. Before ever setting foot on the suspect ground, teams calibrate their instruments over reference test graves to learn what the signal looks like under the site’s environmental conditions. Next comes the detection of surface anomalies, supported by cadaver dogs, then non-invasive geophysical methods such as GPR. Only after these stages does targeted probing follow, and finally full excavation of the site [4][5]. This order is not administrative convenience. It avoids destroying a potential scene and reserves heavy resources for genuinely promising areas.<\/p>

II. Looking from above, remote sensing and drones<\/strong><\/h1>

Surface relief betrays the grave<\/strong><\/h2>

The first sign a grave leaves at the surface is topographic. Digging loosens the soil, which then occupies a greater volume than intact ground and forms a slight mound. Over time, settling of the backfill and collapse of the soft tissues during decomposition instead produce a depression. Oblique aerial photography and drone imagery exploit these variations, but they are fleeting and often hidden by vegetation or smoothed away by weather. To recover this micro-relief beneath tree cover, teams turn to LiDAR, a laser scan that records millions of points and reconstructs the bare-earth surface once vegetation is digitally stripped away, revealing subtle depressions or mounds. LiDAR has the advantage of penetrating gaps in the canopy, but it detects a landform rather than the body itself, and its performance drops under very dense cover.<\/p>

Spectral sensors<\/strong><\/h2>

Beyond relief, decomposition alters the light signature of soil and plants, which multispectral and hyperspectral sensors measure in bands invisible to the naked eye. The published results call for caution. Most studies can only separate disturbed soil from undisturbed soil, without being able to confirm that a grave holds a body rather than merely turned earth [9]. The frequently cited exception is the study by Kalacska and Bell, who distinguished graves from their controls through weaker vegetation regrowth over the graves, attributing that failure to recover to soil toxicity caused by the leaching of decomposition products [7]. In hyperspectral imaging, work has detected buried remains a few months after burial, including in arid settings, and located single graves [8][9]. A programme in Colombia, a country with more than 120,000 missing people, offers a striking data point, since experimental graves there remained detectable eight years after burial using near-infrared multispectral imaging and NDVI, though not with conventional optical sensors [6]. That index, NDVI or the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, compares red and near-infrared light to gauge plant vigour, and it illustrates the variability of these methods, having revealed graves in some studies while yielding no usable anomaly in others [9]. A spectral sensor therefore guarantees nothing, and its performance depends closely on elapsed time, climate and soil type.<\/p>

Thermal imaging<\/strong><\/h2>

Drone-mounted thermal imaging rests on a simple principle. Disturbed earth differs from surrounding soil in compaction and moisture, hence in how it stores and releases heat, and active decomposition itself gives off a little energy. These temperature contrasts show up on an infrared camera, especially at times of day when the ground warms or cools quickly. Studies have accordingly assessed the detection of clandestine graves by airborne thermal imaging in arid environments [9]. The method’s strength lies in its speed and its ability to cover large areas. Its weakness is that the observation window is narrow and highly condition-dependent, which is why dry, high-contrast settings suit it best.<\/p>

III. Probing the subsurface, geophysical methods<\/strong><\/h1>

Ground-penetrating radar<\/strong><\/h2>

Ground-penetrating radar, or GPR, is the central tool of geophysics applied to criminal investigations. It transmits electromagnetic pulses into the ground and records their echoes, which reveal discontinuities such as a grave cut, a wrapped body or a cavity. Since the mid-1990s it has been used to locate clandestine graves, search for missing persons and investigate mass graves [10]. In 2013, in volcanic tuff caves in Italy, a 500 MHz antenna detected a strong anomaly at 2 metres’ depth corresponding to an air-filled burial cavity, which excavation confirmed to contain human remains [10]. Like other geophysical methods, it has the advantage of being non-destructive, fast and inexpensive, and of avoiding needless disturbance of the remains [11]. Frequency choice governs the result, and the landmark ten-year study is clear on this point. Medium frequencies, from 225 to 450 MHz, offer the best trade-off between resolution, depth of investigation, few false anomalies and speed of acquisition, with any wrapping around the body acting as an excellent reflector [12]. GPR’s main limitation is that it loses much of its effectiveness in clay-rich or highly conductive soils, which then calls for pairing it with other sensors [10].<\/p>

Electrical resistivity<\/strong><\/h2>

Electrical resistivity tomography measures how the ground resists the passage of a current, a decomposing body and disturbed soil locally altering that resistance. It often complements GPR and takes over where the latter fails. The same ten-year longitudinal study shows that the signal changes over time, which is crucial for cold cases. A naked burial produces large, low-resistivity anomalies for about four years, after which the body becomes hard to image, whereas a wrapped burial yields small, high-resistivity anomalies for four years, then larger anomalies that remained detectable until the end of the ten-year monitoring period [12]. The same work recommends using resistivity in clay-rich soils, precisely where GPR loses its edge, and running both methods together when it is unknown whether the body was wrapped [12][13]. It also shows that winter and spring surveys offer the best chance of detection [12]. The fact that unsolved cases are typically reviewed roughly every ten years gives such long-term monitoring very concrete relevance for investigators [12].<\/p>

Other geophysical sensors<\/strong><\/h2>

Other instruments round out the subsurface toolkit. Bulk-ground electromagnetic conductivity rapidly maps the soil’s overall conductivity and helps track the migration of decomposition fluids, as the same Colombian monitoring showed by combining drone, GPR, resistivity and conductivity over four to eight years [6]. Magnetometry and magnetic susceptibility mainly detect ferromagnetic objects and contrasts in disturbed or burnt soil, so they target items associated with a burial rather than the body itself, though magnetic susceptibility has been proposed as a search tool [14][15]. Metal detectors, finally, remain useful for locating metallic items buried with the victim, such as jewellery, projectiles, tools or binding wire.<\/p>

IV. When the living reveal the dead, vegetation, fungi and soil chemistry<\/strong><\/h1>

Disturbed vegetation<\/strong><\/h2>

A grave affects plant life in two complementary ways. Digging first destroys the vegetation in place, which is then recolonised by ruderal species, the plants that settle first on disturbed ground, forming a patch distinct from the surrounding cover. At the same time, decomposition releases nutrients that may stimulate growth, or conversely compounds in excess that suppress it. An experimental trial using five pig carcasses buried in Italy, with monthly recording of every plant for a year, confirmed that burial alters plant communities through both mechanical disturbance and changes in the nutrient balance [16]. These changes are sometimes subtle but persistent, and they are all the more legible in naturally poor environments, where a sudden nutrient input favours a markedly different flora above the body [16]. One associated chemical marker, the influx of ninhydrin-reactive nitrogen into gravesoil, has indeed been measured during decomposition [19]. This botanical approach, already part of multidisciplinary grave-detection strategies as early as 1992 [17], is today documented by several field studies [18].<\/p>

Canopy colour, an appealing but fragile lead<\/strong><\/h3>

Among the botanical clues, the idea that tree canopies or leaf colour might betray a buried body is the most spectacular, and also the one to handle with the greatest care. For now it belongs to exploratory research rather than to a validated investigative method. Researchers have proposed turning plant cover, usually seen as an obstacle, into an asset, by suggesting that plant phenotyping from satellite or drone could detect a massive nitrogen input or stress responses such as chlorosis [20]. According to the authors, the speed at which a plant reacts to this nitrogen influx could change the colour and reflectance of its foliage, yet they immediately note that other large mammals, a deer for instance, also die in the places where people go missing, which opens the door to false positives [20]. At this stage, canopy colour is a promising working hypothesis, to be presented as such and not as an operational technique.<\/p>

\"\"
D\u00e9composition d’un renard en zone foresti\u00e8re<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>

Fungi, discreet grave markers<\/strong><\/h3>

Forensic mycology offers a lesser-known and more surprising clue. Two closely related groups, ammonia fungi and so-called postputrefaction fungi, are associated with the breakdown products of cadavers, and their fruit bodies have been observed in woodlands worldwide, sometimes marking grave sites in characteristic successions [21]. These fungi thrive in soils rich in nitrogen compounds, the ammonia released by decomposition being necessary for their fruiting, which explains their affinity for shallow graves [21]. Some species of the genus Hebeloma have even earned the nickname corpse finder, such as Hebeloma syrjense, whose taxonomic status nonetheless remains debated [21]. Two limitations call for great caution. First, no published criminal case has established that fungi enabled a body to be located, the value of these observations remaining to be demonstrated for casework [23]. Second, the species that colonise the soil around a grave are not the same as those growing directly on the remains, so one must avoid treating any fungus present on a body as a grave marker [21][23]. The lead is real and has been documented since the founding work on ammonia fungi [22], but it remains a supporting tool still under evaluation.<\/p>

\"\"<\/figure>

D\u00e9couverte de champignons Hebeloma syrjense en zone foresti\u00e8re<\/em>. Cr\u00e9dit : ForenSeek<\/em><\/p>

The cadaver decomposition island and the soil’s chemical signature<\/strong><\/h3>

Beneath most of these clues lies one and the same phenomenon, the local transformation of soil by decomposition. Scientists speak of the cadaver decomposition island to describe this zone enriched in compounds released by the body, a genuine biochemical hotspot where nitrogen, phosphorus and other elements flood the underlying soil [24]. Recent data from human cadavers quantify this enrichment. A 2025 study, the first of its kind to measure the stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen in human gravesoils, shows that soil nitrogen content more than doubles between days ten and fifteen, rising from about 0.4 to 1.05 per cent, while the nitrogen isotopic signature, \u03b415N, becomes enriched by fifteen to twenty per mil over the first month and stays elevated thereafter [25]. Tellingly for investigators, this marker can betray a decomposition island even when the body has been moved [25]. These indicators, nitrogen, phosphorus, acidity, conductivity and isotopes, become usable through sampling once a suspect area has been identified, and they are accompanied by a profound shift in the soil’s microbial communities that tracks the progress of decomposition [24]. This chemical signature is the objective foundation on which botany, mycology and odour detection all rest to varying degrees.<\/p>

V. Following the odour, dogs and instrumental detection<\/strong><\/h1>

Human remains detection dogs<\/strong><\/h2>

In the field, the dog remains one of the most effective ways to locate remains. These animals are trained to detect the volatile organic compounds given off by decomposition, the odorous molecules that diffuse through soil and air. The measured performance is notable. On gravesoils, dogs gave correct responses in close to 93 per cent of trials, and they detected the presence of remains in soil up to 915 days after death, with the oldest sample identified in 100 per cent of cases [26]. An earlier field programme had established a recovery rate of about 81 per cent [27], and chemical analysis has identified several signature compounds above human burials [28]. Soil texture nonetheless influences the outcome, since it governs the escape of decomposition gases, a sandy soil allowing a faster response than a clay one [29]. These strengths come with limitations that must be acknowledged. Trained dogs are costly to train and maintain, work only for short periods, can give false alerts and cannot indicate precisely what they are detecting [30].<\/p>

The electronic nose<\/strong><\/h2>

To make this sense of smell objective and to ease its constraints, research is developing electronic noses able to analyse volatile compounds. A portable device, the NOS.E, detected and differentiated a range of decomposition-related molecules with an average sensitivity of around eight parts per million, and told a human donor from controls as early as the third day after death, while offering portability, speed and lower costs than dogs and benchtop instruments [31]. The most recent approaches couple sensor arrays with machine learning, a thirty-two metal-oxide-sensor electronic nose having classified post-mortem versus ante-mortem samples with 98.1 per cent accuracy and distinguished human from animal tissue with 97.2 per cent accuracy [32]. The practical limitation lies in odour dispersal, since a stationary device may miss a diluted plume, and in the sampled matrix, since soil and air do not yield exactly the same compounds, which argues for sampling both [31][33]. The electronic nose does not yet replace the dog, but it makes for a promising and reproducible complement.<\/p>

VI. From anomaly to evidence, confirmation and recovery<\/strong><\/h1>

None of these non-intrusive methods proves on its own that a body is present, since all of them flag an anomaly that must be confirmed. After GPR come targeted probing, carried out by coring or with a metal probe whose escaping gases are smelled, then sampling of soil, vegetation or water, before progressive stripping of the ground and full excavation [4]. This last stage falls to forensic archaeology and anthropology, the only disciplines able to expose the remains by a rigorous method that preserves their position, the associated traces and the evidential value of the whole [34]. It is this controlled passage from a detected anomaly to a documented exhumation that turns a hypothesis about location into evidence usable before a court.<\/p>

Comparative summary of methods<\/strong><\/h1>

The table below summarises the main methods, what they aim to detect, their favourable conditions, their chief limitation and how intrusive they are.<\/p>

Method<\/strong><\/td>What it targets<\/strong><\/td>Favourable conditions<\/strong><\/td>Main limitation<\/strong><\/td>Intrusiveness<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><\/thead>
Aerial photography, micro-relief<\/strong><\/td>Ground surface disturbance<\/td>Open ground, recent grave<\/td>Fleeting traces, hidden by vegetation<\/td>None<\/td><\/tr>
LiDAR<\/strong><\/td>Micro-depressions under cover<\/td>Wooded areas, bare-earth modelling<\/td>Detects landform, not the body<\/td>None<\/td><\/tr>
Multispectral and hyperspectral imaging<\/strong><\/td>Plant stress, disturbed soil<\/td>After regrowth, a few months on<\/td>Variable results, sensitive to bare soil<\/td>None<\/td><\/tr>
Drone thermal imaging<\/strong><\/td>Thermal contrast of disturbed soil<\/td>Arid settings, diurnal transitions<\/td>Narrow window, highly condition-dependent<\/td>None<\/td><\/tr>
Ground-penetrating radar<\/strong><\/td>Grave cut, body, cavity<\/td>Sandy or dry soils, wrapped body<\/td>Fails in clay-rich or conductive soils<\/td>None<\/td><\/tr>
Electrical resistivity<\/strong><\/td>Soil resistivity anomaly<\/td>Homogeneous soil, moist conditions<\/td>Signal evolves and fades over time<\/td>None<\/td><\/tr>
Electromagnetic conductivity<\/strong><\/td>Decomposition fluids, disturbed soil<\/td>Rapid mapping of large areas<\/td>Lower resolution than resistivity<\/td>None<\/td><\/tr>
Magnetometry, susceptibility<\/strong><\/td>Ferrous objects, burnt soil<\/td>Associated metallic items<\/td>Targets the object more than the body<\/td>None<\/td><\/tr>
Vegetation, botany<\/strong><\/td>Shift in plant community<\/td>Poor soils, monitoring over time<\/td>Subtle, non-specific clue<\/td>Low<\/td><\/tr>
Canopy colour (phytoforensics)<\/strong><\/td>Induced reflectance and chlorosis<\/td>Concept, yet to be validated<\/td>Unvalidated, false positives (wildlife)<\/td>None<\/td><\/tr>
Marker fungi<\/strong><\/td>Fruit bodies tied to decomposition<\/td>Woodlands, seasonal fruiting<\/td>No judicial validation, transient presence<\/td>Low<\/td><\/tr>
Soil chemistry, decomposition island<\/strong><\/td>Nitrogen and isotope signature<\/td>Already pre-selected area<\/td>Requires targeted sampling<\/td>Low<\/td><\/tr>
Detection dogs<\/strong><\/td>Volatile decomposition compounds<\/td>Loose soil, short sessions<\/td>Cost, fatigue, false alerts, non-explainable result<\/td>None<\/td><\/tr>
Electronic nose<\/strong><\/td>Objectified volatile compounds<\/td>Soil and air sampling<\/td>Plume dispersal, immature technology<\/td>Low<\/td><\/tr>
Probing, forensic archaeology<\/strong><\/td>Confirmation and recovery<\/td>Confirmed restricted area<\/td>Destructive, slow<\/td>High<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>

Conclusion<\/strong><\/h1>

Searching for a buried body is therefore not a matter of some miracle sensor, but of a coherent chain in which intelligence delimits the ground, remote sensing and geophysics flag anomalies, botany, mycology and soil chemistry provide converging clues, and excavation confirms. Success always depends on soil type, climate, depth, elapsed time and the way the body was buried, variables that shift the real question from which method to use towards which method to use, when, and in which soil. In a case such as that of Delphine Jubillar, a confession and an indication of place do not close the search, they reopen it, and it is precisely this scientific arsenal that will have to turn a statement into a location, and a location into remains at last returned to their family.<\/p>

R\u00e9f\u00e9rences <\/strong>: <\/p>

[1] <\/strong>Affaire Jubillar, de la disparition de Delphine aux aveux de C\u00e9dric. CNews<\/a><\/em>, 6 juillet 2026. Aveux confirm\u00e9s par La D\u00e9p\u00eache du Midi et l’Agence France-Presse.<\/p>

[2] <\/strong>Harrison M, Donnelly LJ. Locating concealed homicide victims, developing the role of geoforensics. In Criminal and Environmental Soil Forensics<\/em>. Dordrecht, Springer, 2009, p. 197-219.<\/p>

[3] <\/strong>Geoforensic methods for detecting clandestine graves and buried forensic objects in criminal investigations, a review. Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine<\/em>, 2024, vol. 10, n\u00b0 3.<\/p>

[4] <\/strong>Pringle JK. Geoforensic search on land. Geology Today<\/em>, 2024, vol. 40, n\u00b0 4.<\/p>

[5] <\/strong>Pringle JK, Ruell A, Jervis JR, Donnelly LJ, McKinley J, Hansen JD, et al. The use of geoscience methods for terrestrial forensic searches. Earth-Science Reviews<\/em>, 2012, vol. 114, p. 108-123.<\/p>

[6] <\/strong>Molina CM, Wisniewski KD, Salamanca A, Saumett M, Rojas C, G\u00f3mez H, Baena A, Pringle JK. Monitoring of simulated clandestine graves of victims using UAVs, GPR, electrical tomography and conductivity over 4-8 years post-burial to aid forensic search investigators in Colombia, South America. Forensic Science International<\/em>, 2024, vol. 355, article 111919.<\/p>

[7] <\/strong>Kalacska M, Bell LS. Remote sensing as a tool for the detection of clandestine mass graves. Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal<\/em>, 2006, vol. 39, n\u00b0 1, p. 1-13.<\/p>

[8] <\/strong>Leblanc G, Kalacska M, Soffer R. Detection of single graves by airborne hyperspectral imaging. Forensic Science International<\/em>, 2014, vol. 245, p. 17-23.<\/p>

[9] <\/strong>A review of predictive modelling and drone remote sensing technologies as a tool for detecting clandestine burials. Forensic Science International<\/em>, 2025.<\/p>

[10] <\/strong>Ground penetrating radar in forensic science, applications, methodologies, challenges, and future directions, a comprehensive review. Perspectives in Legal and Forensic Sciences<\/em>, 2026.<\/p>

[11] <\/strong>Pringle JK, Jervis JR, Hansen JD, et al. Geophysical monitoring of simulated clandestine graves using electrical and ground-penetrating radar methods, 0-3 years after burial. Journal of Forensic Sciences<\/em>, 2012, vol. 57, n\u00b0 6, p. 1467-1486.<\/p>

[12] <\/strong>Pringle JK, Stimpson IG, Wisniewski KD, et al. Geophysical monitoring of simulated homicide burials for forensic investigations. Scientific Reports<\/em>, 2020, vol. 10, article 7544.<\/p>

[13] <\/strong>Pringle JK, Jervis JR, Roberts D, et al. Long-term geophysical monitoring of simulated clandestine graves using electrical and ground penetrating radar methods, 4-6 years after burial. Journal of Forensic Sciences<\/em>, 2016, vol. 61, n\u00b0 2, p. 309-321.<\/p>

[14] <\/strong>Pringle JK, Giubertoni M, Cassidy NJ, et al. The use of magnetic susceptibility as a forensic search tool. Forensic Science International<\/em>, 2015, vol. 246, p. 31-42.<\/p>

[15] <\/strong>Juerges A, Pringle JK, Jervis JR, Masters P. Comparisons of magnetic and electrical resistivity surveys over simulated clandestine graves in contrasting burial environments. Near Surface Geophysics<\/em>, 2010, vol. 8, p. 529-539.<\/p>

[16] <\/strong>Caccianiga M, Bottacin S, Cattaneo C. Vegetation dynamics as a tool for detecting clandestine graves. Journal of Forensic Sciences<\/em>, 2012, vol. 57, n\u00b0 4, p. 983-988.<\/p>

[17] <\/strong>France DL, Griffin TJ, Swanburg JG, et al. A multidisciplinary approach to the detection of clandestine graves. Journal of Forensic Sciences<\/em>, 1992, vol. 37, n\u00b0 6, p. 1445-1458.<\/p>

[18] <\/strong>Watson CJ, Forbes SL. An investigation of the vegetation associated with grave sites in southern Ontario. Canadian Society of Forensic Science Journal<\/em>, 2008, vol. 41, n\u00b0 4, p. 199-207.<\/p>

[19] <\/strong>Van Belle LE, Carter DO, Forbes SL. Measurement of ninhydrin reactive nitrogen influx into gravesoil during aboveground and belowground carcass (Sus domesticus) decomposition. Forensic Science International<\/em>, 2009, vol. 193, p. 37-41.<\/p>

[20] <\/strong>Plants to remotely detect human decomposition ? Trends in Plant Science<\/em>, 2020, vol. 25, n\u00b0 10.<\/p>

[21] <\/strong>Tibbett M, Carter DO. Mushrooms and taphonomy, the fungi that mark woodland graves. Mycologist<\/em>, 2003, vol. 17, n\u00b0 1, p. 20-24.<\/p>

[22] <\/strong>Sagara N. Ammonia fungi, a chemoecological grouping of terrestrial fungi. Contributions from the Biological Laboratory, Kyoto University<\/em>, 1975, vol. 24, p. 205-276.<\/p>

[23] <\/strong>Hawksworth DL, Wiltshire PEJ. Forensic mycology, the use of fungi in criminal investigations. Forensic Science International<\/em>, 2011, vol. 206, p. 1-11.<\/p>

[24] <\/strong>Carter DO, Yellowlees D, Tibbett M. Cadaver decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Naturwissenschaften<\/em>, 2007, vol. 94, n\u00b0 1, p. 12-24.<\/p>

[25] <\/strong>Miles KL, Gibbon V, Hayden B. Human cadaver decomposition islands and forensic taphonomy, gravesoil \u03b413C and \u03b415N enrichment patterns in short (30 d) and extended (900 d) postmortem intervals. Forensic Sciences Research<\/em>, 2025, DOI 10.1093\/fsr\/owaf027.<\/p>

[26] <\/strong>Alexander MB, Hodges TK, Bytheway J, Aitkenhead-Peterson JA. Application of soil in forensic science, residual odor and human remains detection dogs. Forensic Science International<\/em>, 2015, vol. 249, p. 304-313.<\/p>

[27] <\/strong>Komar D. The use of cadaver dogs in locating scattered, scavenged human remains. Journal of Forensic Sciences<\/em>, 1999, vol. 44, n\u00b0 2, p. 405-408.<\/p>

[28] <\/strong>Vass AA, Smith RR, Thompson CV, et al. Odor analysis of decomposing buried human remains. Journal of Forensic Sciences<\/em>, 2008, vol. 53, n\u00b0 2, p. 384-391.<\/p>

[29] <\/strong>Alexander MB, Hodges TK, Wescott DJ, Aitkenhead-Peterson JA. The effects of soil texture on the ability of human remains detection dogs to detect buried human remains. Journal of Forensic Sciences<\/em>, 2016, vol. 61, n\u00b0 3, p. 649-655.<\/p>

[30] <\/strong>Cadaver-detection dogs, a review of their capabilities and the volatile organic compound profile of their associated training aids. WIREs Forensic Science<\/em>, 2021.<\/p>

[31] <\/strong>Sunnucks EJ, Thurn B, Brown AO, Zhang W, Liu T, Forbes SL, Su S, Ueland M. Performance of a novel electronic nose (NOS.E) for the detection of volatile organic compounds relating to starvation or human decomposition post-mass disaster. Sensors<\/em>, 2024, vol. 24, n\u00b0 18, article 5918.<\/p>

[32] <\/strong>Shtepliuk I, et al. Adaptive machine learning for electronic nose-based forensic volatile organic compound classification. Advanced Science<\/em>, 2025, DOI 10.1002\/advs.202504657.<\/p>

[33] <\/strong>Decomposition odour profiling in the air and soil surrounding vertebrate carrion, 2014 (r\u00e9f\u00e9rence \u00e0 confirmer sur la source primaire).<\/p>

[34] <\/strong>Blau S, Sterenberg J. The use of forensic archaeology and anthropology in the search and recovery of buried evidence. In Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine<\/em>, 2e \u00e9d., Elsevier, 2015, p. 236-245.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On 6 July 2026, five years after his wife disappeared, C\u00e9dric Jubillar confessed in a letter to one of his lawyers, admitting that he had killed Delphine and saying he was willing to indicate where he had concealed the body [1]. Convicted at first instance and sentenced to thirty years’ imprisonment, with his appeal still … Continue reading How to search for a buried body?<\/span> →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":23710,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[99,104,110],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23714","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-articles-en","category-news-en","category-les-innovations-technologiques-en"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nRechercher un corps enfoui, m\u00e9thodes et limites scientifiques<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Comment les enqu\u00eateurs recherchent les personnes disparues et localisent les corps enfouis ? G\u00e9oradar, drones, chiens, botanique et chimie.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rechercher un corps enfoui, m\u00e9thodes et limites scientifiques\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Comment les enqu\u00eateurs recherchent les personnes disparues et localisent les corps enfouis ? G\u00e9oradar, drones, chiens, botanique et chimie.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Forenseek\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/forenseekfr\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-07-06T22:00:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-07-06T22:06:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Foret-personne-disparue-jubillar-police-scientifique-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"2560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1065\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"22 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/en\\\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/en\\\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/9bc34ac0c5ce1151a1f868836c1c4811\"},\"headline\":\"How to search for a buried body?\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-06T22:00:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-06T22:06:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/en\\\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":3878,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/en\\\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/Foret-personne-disparue-jubillar-police-scientifique-scaled.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Articles\",\"News\",\"Technological innovations\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/en\\\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/en\\\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/en\\\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\\\/\",\"name\":\"Rechercher un corps enfoui, m\u00e9thodes et limites scientifiques\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/en\\\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/en\\\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/Foret-personne-disparue-jubillar-police-scientifique-scaled.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-07-06T22:00:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-07-06T22:06:19+00:00\",\"description\":\"Comment les enqu\u00eateurs recherchent les personnes disparues et localisent les corps enfouis ? G\u00e9oradar, drones, chiens, botanique et chimie.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/en\\\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/en\\\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/en\\\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/Foret-personne-disparue-jubillar-police-scientifique-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/07\\\/Foret-personne-disparue-jubillar-police-scientifique-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":1065,\"caption\":\"dark forest panorama with trees in fog\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/en\\\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Accueil\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"How to search for a buried body?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Forenseek\",\"description\":\"Ad Verum Ad Justitia\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Forenseek\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/LOGO-YOUTUBE-FORENSEEK.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2022\\\/02\\\/LOGO-YOUTUBE-FORENSEEK.jpg\",\"width\":1,\"height\":1,\"caption\":\"Forenseek\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/forenseekfr\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/forenseekfr\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/forenseek\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/concours-police-scientifique.fr\\\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/9bc34ac0c5ce1151a1f868836c1c4811\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/67b22bb5bd11baa7a59348e725a2113799750a6d787b66f09171c7dfe7cc903b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/67b22bb5bd11baa7a59348e725a2113799750a6d787b66f09171c7dfe7cc903b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/67b22bb5bd11baa7a59348e725a2113799750a6d787b66f09171c7dfe7cc903b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.forenseek.fr\\\/en\\\/author\\\/admin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rechercher un corps enfoui, m\u00e9thodes et limites scientifiques","description":"Comment les enqu\u00eateurs recherchent les personnes disparues et localisent les corps enfouis ? G\u00e9oradar, drones, chiens, botanique et chimie.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rechercher un corps enfoui, m\u00e9thodes et limites scientifiques","og_description":"Comment les enqu\u00eateurs recherchent les personnes disparues et localisent les corps enfouis ? G\u00e9oradar, drones, chiens, botanique et chimie.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\/","og_site_name":"Forenseek","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/forenseekfr\/","article_published_time":"2026-07-06T22:00:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-07-06T22:06:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":2560,"height":1065,"url":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Foret-personne-disparue-jubillar-police-scientifique-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"22 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/#\/schema\/person\/9bc34ac0c5ce1151a1f868836c1c4811"},"headline":"How to search for a buried body?","datePublished":"2026-07-06T22:00:11+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-06T22:06:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\/"},"wordCount":3878,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Foret-personne-disparue-jubillar-police-scientifique-scaled.jpg","articleSection":["Articles","News","Technological innovations"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\/","url":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\/","name":"Rechercher un corps enfoui, m\u00e9thodes et limites scientifiques","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Foret-personne-disparue-jubillar-police-scientifique-scaled.jpg","datePublished":"2026-07-06T22:00:11+00:00","dateModified":"2026-07-06T22:06:19+00:00","description":"Comment les enqu\u00eateurs recherchent les personnes disparues et localisent les corps enfouis ? G\u00e9oradar, drones, chiens, botanique et chimie.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Foret-personne-disparue-jubillar-police-scientifique-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/Foret-personne-disparue-jubillar-police-scientifique-scaled.jpg","width":2560,"height":1065,"caption":"dark forest panorama with trees in fog"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/rechercher-corps-enfoui-methodes-scientifiques\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"How to search for a buried body?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/","name":"Forenseek","description":"Ad Verum Ad Justitia","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/#organization","name":"Forenseek","url":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/LOGO-YOUTUBE-FORENSEEK.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/LOGO-YOUTUBE-FORENSEEK.jpg","width":1,"height":1,"caption":"Forenseek"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/forenseekfr\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/forenseekfr\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/forenseek\/","https:\/\/concours-police-scientifique.fr\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/#\/schema\/person\/9bc34ac0c5ce1151a1f868836c1c4811","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/67b22bb5bd11baa7a59348e725a2113799750a6d787b66f09171c7dfe7cc903b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/67b22bb5bd11baa7a59348e725a2113799750a6d787b66f09171c7dfe7cc903b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/67b22bb5bd11baa7a59348e725a2113799750a6d787b66f09171c7dfe7cc903b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr"],"url":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23714","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23714"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23714\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23716,"href":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23714\/revisions\/23716"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/23710"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23714"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23714"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.forenseek.fr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23714"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}